Introduction
Lefohn et al. (2008) summarized their trends
analyses for surface ozone monitoring sites across the United
States. Using statistical trending on a site-by-site basis of
the (1) health-based annual 2nd highest 1-hour average concentration
and annual 4th highest daily maximum 8-hour average concentration
and (2) vegetation-based annual seasonally corrected 24-hour
W126 cumulative exposure index, they investigated temporal and
spatial statistically significant changes that occurred in surface
ozone in the United States for the periods 1980-2005 and 1990-2005
and explored whether differences in trending occur depending
upon the selection of the exposure metric. Using the trending
results, the analyses quantitatively explore the evidence for
the higher hourly average ozone concentrations decreasing faster
than the mid- and lower-values.
Results
Figure 1 below from Lefohn et al. (2008) summarizes
the findings for the trending of the 4th highest 8-hour ozone
metric for the 1980-2005 and 1990-2005 periods.
Figure 1. Trend of 4th highest 8-hour average
ozone metric for the (a) 1980-2005 and (b) 1990-2005 periods.
This figure was published in Lefohn et. al. (2008). Copyright
Elsevier. Please see reference below. Permission granted by Elsevier
to reproduce the above figure only on this web page.
Most of the surface ozone monitoring sites
analyzed in the study experienced decreasing or no trends. Few
monitoring sites experienced increasing trends. For those monitoring
sites with declining ozone levels, an initial pattern of rapid
decrease in the higher hourly average concentrations, followed
by a much slower decrease in mid-level concentrations was observed.
In some cases, they observed shifts from the lower hourly average
ozone concentrations to the mid-level values. On a site-by-site
basis, the majority of monitoring sites (1) changed from negative
trend to no trend, (2) continued a negative trend, or (3) remained
in the no trend status, when comparing trends for the 1980-2005
to the 1990-2005 time periods. For the three exposure metrics
(i.e., annual 2nd highest 1-hour average concentration, annual
4th highest daily maximum 8-hour average concentration, and vegetation-based
annual seasonally corrected 24-hour W126 cumulative exposure
index, approximately 60% of the monitoring sites shifted from
negative trending to no trending status. All regions of the United
States were equally affected by the shift in status.
Lefohn et al. (2008) in their paper provide
several figures that illustrate the spatial patterns of trends
across the United States. The greatest statistically significant
decreases in the 2nd highest 1-hour average concentrations and
the annual 4th highest daily maximum 8-hour average concentration
for the two temporal periods occurred in southern California.
Monitoring sites in other portions of the United States experienced
lesser decreases than this geographic area. In contrast to the
two exposure indices, the vegetation-based 24-hour W126 ozone
cumulative index for 1980-2005 experienced significant declines
in the midwestern states and the northeastern United States as
well as in southern California. For the 1990-2005 period, monitoring
sites in southern California and the northeastern United States
experienced the greatest decreases in the W126 exposure metric.
When trending was observed, not all months
experienced trending. Lefohn et al. (2008) tested for statistically
significant changes in the number of hourly average concentrations
within specified concentration intervals and identified specific
months that experienced shifts in the distribution of the hourly
average concentrations. As an example, Figures 2 and 3 below
illustrate the changes in the distribution of the hourly average
ozone concentrations for a monitoring site located in Reseda
in Los Angeles County as reductions occurred over the 1980-2005
and 1990-2005 periods.
Figure 2. Distribution of changes by month
for a monitoring site located in Los Angeles County, California
(AQS 060371201) for 1980-2005 for the months with significant
changes.
Figure 3. Distribution of changes by month
for a monitoring site located in Los Angeles County, California
(AQS 060371201) for 1990-2005 for the months with significant
changes.
The two figures show the reductions in the
number of hourly average concentrations in the higher hourly
average concentrations and the increases in the mid-level concentrations
as the peak values were reduced. The Thiel estimate was used
to estimate trending. The Thiel estimate is determined as the
median of slope estimates calculated as the slope of the line
passing through two points for all pairs of points in the data
set of interest. To test for statistical significance, Kendall's
tau test was used to determine significance at the 10% level.
Note that the months of March and April exhibited statistically
significant trending in the 1980-2005 period, but did not exhibit
statistically significant trending over the 1990-2005 period.
Over the 1990-2005 period, the month of September exhibited statistically
significant trending but did not over the 1980-2005 period.
Lefohn et al. (2010) updated the trending
results reported in Lefohn et al. (2008). The updated trending
periods were 1980-2008 (29 years) and 1994-2008 (15 years). In
addition to updating the trends analysis, the authors focused
on 12 urban and 15 rural monitoring sites. The most current trending
results provide examples on why it is important to investigate the change in the trending
pattern with time (e.g., moving 15-year trending) in order to
assess how year-to-year variability may influence the trend calculation.
Several research investigations have explored trending from the
beginning of a data series until the latest date for collection
of data. However, these types of trends analyses do not take
into consideration the possibility that the rate of trending
over the period of record has changed and in some cases the trending
has ceased. Lefohn et al. (2010) take a closer look at changes
in the rate of trending and draw conclusions about the importance
of using 15-year moving trends to quantify trending rates. The
paper's abstract is available on our publications web page.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Most of the surface ozone monitoring sites
analyzed in the Lefohn et al. (2008, 2010) studies experienced
decreasing or no trends. Few monitoring sites experienced increasing
trends. Lefohn et al. (2008, 2010) observed that a statistically
significant trend at a specific monitoring site, using one exposure
index, did not necessarily result in a similar trend using the
other two indices. The authors recommended that because different
trending patterns were observed when applying the various exposure
indices, a careful selection of ozone exposure metrics is required
when assessing trends for specific purposes, such as human health,
vegetation, and climate change effects.
Part 2 - Ozone
Trends of “Signature” Monitoring Stations for Assessing
Background Ozone Trending
Introduction
Over the past several years,
there have been several articles quoting other sources indicating
that surface ozone concentrations are increasing everywhere.
Our most current research results do not support this claim.
Our research efforts monitor the status of worldwide ozone levels
by performing sophisticated analyses using surface ozone and
ozonesonde data (e.g., Oltmans et al., 1998; Oltmans et al.,
2006; Oltmans et al., 2013). Our research focuses on the results
from the available data from four decades of observations for
the longest records (ozonesondes). Several “signature”
stations have 20-30 years of observations for both surface and
ozonesondes. The “signature" ozone monitoring stations
provide good data for the purpose of assessing possible changes
in background levels of ozone. Some of the "Signature"
sites offer the opportunity to study records that are representative
of broad geographic regions where local effects are minimized.
Our most recent publication (Oltmans et al.,
2013) discusses the longer-term
(i.e., 20-40 years) tropospheric ozone time series obtained from
surface and ozonesonde observations that we analyzed to assess
possible changes with time through 2010. The time series have
been selected to reflect relatively broad geographic regions
and where possible minimize local scale influences, generally
avoiding sites close to larger urban areas. Several approaches
have been used to describe the changes with time, including application
of a time-series model, running 15-year trends, and changes in
the distribution by month in the ozone mixing ratio. Changes
have been investigated utilizing monthly averages, as well as
exposure metrics that focus on specific parts of the distribution
of hourly average concentrations (e.g., low-, mid-, and high-level
concentration ranges). Many of the longer time series (~30 years)
in mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, including those
in Japan, show a pattern of significant increase in the earlier
portion of the record, with a flattening over the last 10-15
years. It is uncertain if the flattening of the ozone change
over Japan reflects the impact of ozone transported from continental
East Asia in light of reported ozone increases in China. In the
Canadian Arctic, declines from the beginning of the ozonesonde
record in 1980 have mostly rebounded with little overall change
over the period of record. The limited data in the tropical Pacific
suggest very little change over the entire record. In the southern
hemisphere subtropics and midlatitudes, the significant increase
observed in the early part of the record has leveled off in the
most recent decade. At the South Pole, a decline observed during
the first half of the 35-year record has reversed, and ozone
has recovered to levels similar to the beginning of the record.
Our understanding of the causes of the longer-term changes is
limited, although it appears that in the mid-latitudes of the
northern hemisphere, controls on ozone precursors have likely
been a factor in the leveling off or decline from earlier ozone
increases.
As indicated earlier in the
Part 1 discussion, it is important to investigate the rate-of-change
in trending and not just analyze for trends using the beginning
and ending periods of monitoring. For example, Logan et al. (2012)
described the decrease in ozone over Europe since 1998, with
the largest decrease during the summertime. Using Zugspitze data
for 1978-1989 and the mean time series from three Alpine stations
since 1990, Logan et al. (2012) found that the ozone increased
substantially in 1978-1989 (i.e., 6.5-10 ppb but began to exhibit
a reduced rate of increase in the 1990s (i.e., 2.5-4.5 ppb) with
decreases in the 2000s (i.e., 4 ppb) in summer with no significant
changes in other seasons. Overall in summer no trend was noted
for the 1990-2009 period.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Our results and
the results recently reported by Logan et al. (2012) suggest
that on a hemispheric scale it is currently difficult to observe
the projected increases in tropospheric ozone that models indicate
may occur from growing Asian emissions. This may result from
the lack of such ozone increases or that changes resulting from
precursor reductions in North America and Europe have made the
influence of Asian precursor emissions more difficult to detect.
Changes in hourly average ozone distributions at the low-, mid
and high-level ranges for sites investigated in our most recent
study do not indicate that background ozone concentrations continue
to increase in the most recent decades. As indicated in our analysis
and others, at many of the investigated sites earlier ozone increases
have reached a plateau and in some
cases begun to decrease. In order to follow future trend patterns,
it will be important to use techniques that capture the time
evolution of ozone changes such as the 15-year trend periods
used by Lefohn et al. (2010) and Oltmans et al. (2013) or other
methods that detect these changes. In particular it will be important
to determine if the widespread flattening or declining ozone
concentrations reported here reflect longer-term changes in precursor
ozone emissions.
References
Lefohn A. S., Shadwick D., and Oltmans S.
J. (2008). Characterizing long-term changes in surface ozone
levels in the United States (1980-2005). Atmospheric Environment.
42:8252-8262.
Lefohn, A. S., Shadwick, D.,
Oltmans, S. J. (2010). Characterizing changes of surface ozone
levels in metropolitan and rural areas in the United States for
1980-2008 and 1994-2008. Atmospheric Environment. 44:5199-5210.
Logan, J.A. et al. (2012).
Changes in ozone over Europe: Analysis of ozone measurements
from sondes, regular aircraft (MOZAIC) and alpine surface sites,
Journal of Geophysical Research, 117, D09031, doi:10.1029/2011JD16952.
Oltmans S. J., Lefohn A. S.,
Scheel H. E., Harris J. M., Levy H. II, Galbally I. E. , Brunke
E. G., Meyer C. P., Lathrop J. A., Johnson B. J., Shadwick D.
S., Cuevas E., Schmidlin F. J., Tarasick D. W., Claude H., Kerr
J. B., Uchino O., and Mohnen V. (1998). Trends of ozone in the
troposphere. Geophysical Research Letters. 25:139-142.
Oltmans S. J., Lefohn A. S.,
Harris J. M., Galbally I., Scheel H. E., Bodeker G., Brunke E.,
Claude H., Tarasick D., Johnson B.J., Simmonds P., Shadwick D.,
Anlauf K., Hayden K., Schmidlin F., Fujimoto T., Akagi K., Meyer
C., Nichol S., Davies J., Redondas A., and Cuevas E. (2006).
Long-term changes in tropospheric ozone. Atmospheric Environment.
40:3156-3173.
Oltmans, S.J., Lefohn, A.S.,
Shadwick, D., Harris, J.M., Scheel, H.-E., Galbally, I., Tarasick,
D.A., Johnson, B.J., Brunke, E., Claude, H., Zeng, G., Nichol,
S., Schmidlin, F., Redondas, A., Cuevas, E., Nakano, T., Kawasato,
T. (2013). Recent Tropospheric Ozone Changes - A Pattern Dominated
by Slow or No Growth. Atmospheric Environment. 67:331-351.
